APA FORMAT Essays - Typography, Writing, Graphic Design, Text

The Marine Corp Memorial Essay Summary Example For Students

The Marine Corp Memorial Essay Summary On February 19, 1945 five Marines and one Sailor took part in an occasion that would perpetually change the course of occasions for the Marine Corps. Without a doubt one of the most remarkable pictures of the twentieth century is the banner raising on Mount Suribachi on Iwo Jima. The banner raising caught the fortitude, responsibility and respect that these Marines held as they arrived at the top. These people were just doing what they were told to do, however it was the Pulitzer Prize winning photo that was taken by Joe Rosenthal that transformed this war time occasion into an overall authentic occasion. Behind the falcon, globe and grapple, the banner raising has appeared as a second insignia for the Marine Corps. Felix de Weldon was at the hour of the banner bringing up in the United States Navy. Felix was at that point a world-disavowed artist. At seventeen years old he won a stone worker challenge in his local Austria. He concentrated in France, Italy and Spain and in the end examined antiquarianism at Oxford. After showing up in the United States he began to look all starry eyed at this nation and its way of life. He joined the U. S. Naval force as a Seabee. Felix de Weldon has been alluded to as the craftsman to the presidents and rulers. Felix was so moved by the photo that he developed a scale model and afterward an actual existence size model of it. Gagnon, Hayes, and Bradley, the three overcomers of the banner raising postured for the stone carver. The first sculpture which was thrown in mortar went in plain view before the Old Navy Building in Washington D. C. from 1945-19 46. It was utilized to advance war bonds around the nation. In 1946 General Vandegrift was so moved by the sculpture that he had Felix de Weldon moved from the Navy to the Marine Corps and appointed him to deliver the commemoration we see today. The remembrance like some other in Washington was met with debate. The essential question originated from the National Sculpture Society. This general public had done the entirety of the large remembrances in Washington and didn't what to be forgotten about on this one. The Governments Commission of Fine Arts likewise participated in the endeavor to stop the dedication. The commission designated by the president, was an assortment of tasteful advisors that had ward over craftsmanship set on government property in the capital. The fight was not between the Marines and the post war innovator yet a battle among the promoters of customary illustrative workmanship. The commission needed the Marine Corp class to drop de Weldon and go with a craftsman through open rivalry. The Marines knew de Weldons adaptation of the sculpture and that was the sculpture they needed. Ten teachers from American University all things considered excused de Weldons form as average quality and called it customary, inadequate, and unsculpturesque. Donald De Lu leader of the National Sculpture Society expressed that: Instead of deifying the fearless Marines who have given their lives for their nation, the proposed plan, whenever allowed to be done would be just a wellspring of unpleasant hatred, vicious analysis, and disparagement. William Wheeler, later to turn into the President of the Sculpture Society, submitted as letter to Secretary of State Forrestal asserting various wrong doings by de Weldon. These charges went from obscure strategic approaches, lapsed visa, distorting craftsmanship, and delivery busts that were as yet wet and the suing for harms when they showed up harmed. In late 1947 the landmark got another mishap. The Commission of Fine Art, which has the stylish endorsement of all landmarks put in the Washington territory, dismissed the commemoration due to its size and the area that was chosen. Later that equivalent year the Marine Corps War Memorial Foundation was framed with General Denig as president and Harry Dash as head of money. .u265b0d0fe68ede2ee10153d07cbe1198 , .u265b0d0fe68ede2ee10153d07cbe1198 .postImageUrl , .u265b0d0fe68ede2ee10153d07cbe1198 .focused content region { min-tallness: 80px; position: relative; } .u265b0d0fe68ede2ee10153d07cbe1198 , .u265b0d0fe68ede2ee10153d07cbe1198:hover , .u265b0d0fe68ede2ee10153d07cbe1198:visited , .u265b0d0fe68ede2ee10153d07cbe1198:active { border:0!important; } .u265b0d0fe68ede2ee10153d07cbe1198 .clearfix:after { content: ; show: table; clear: both; } .u265b0d0fe68ede2ee10153d07cbe1198 { show: square; progress: foundation shading 250ms; webkit-change: foundation shading 250ms; width: 100%; mistiness: 1; change: murkiness 250ms; webkit-progress: obscurity 250ms; foundation shading: #95A5A6; } .u265b0d0fe68ede2ee10153d07cbe1198:active , .u265b0d0fe68ede2ee10153d07cbe1198:hover { darkness: 1; change: haziness 250ms; webkit-progress: darkness 250ms; foundation shading: #2C3E50; } .u265b0d0fe68ede2ee10153d07cbe1198 .focused content territory { width: 100%; position: rela tive; } .u265b0d0fe68ede2ee10153d07cbe1198 .ctaText { outskirt base: 0 strong #fff; shading: #2980B9; text dimension: 16px; textual style weight: intense; edge: 0; cushioning: 0; content adornment: underline; } .u265b0d0fe68ede2ee10153d07cbe1198 .postTitle { shading: #FFFFFF; text dimension: 16px; textual style weight: 600; edge: 0; cushioning: 0; width: 100%; } .u265b0d0fe68ede2ee10153d07cbe1198 .ctaButton { foundation shading: #7F8C8D!important; shading: #2980B9; fringe: none; outskirt sweep: 3px; box-shadow: none; text dimension: 14px; text style weight: striking; line-stature: 26px; moz-outskirt range: 3px; content adjust: focus; content improvement: none; content shadow: none; width: 80px; min-tallness: 80px; foundation: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/modules/intelly-related-posts/resources/pictures/basic arrow.png)no-rehash; position: supreme; right: 0; top: 0; } .u265b0d0fe68ede2ee10153d07cbe1198:hover .ctaButton { foundation shading: #34495E!important; } .u265b0d0fe 68ede2ee10153d07cbe1198 .focused content { show: table; stature: 80px; cushioning left: 18px; top: 0; } .u265b0d0fe68ede2ee10153d07cbe1198-content { show: table-cell; edge: 0; cushioning: 0; cushioning right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-adjust: center; width: 100%; } .u265b0d0fe68ede2ee10153d07cbe1198:after { content: ; show: square; clear: both; } READ: Causes And Effects Of Earthquakes EssayIt was later found that Harry Dash was stealing reserves adding up to over $100,000 of the commitments. This difficulty nearly shut down the commemoration yet however the relentlessness of a Marine General practically the entirety of the assets were recouped and development on the remembrance continued. On the 176th birthday celebration of the Marine Corps November tenth, 1954 the commemoration was uncovered and for the individuals who saw the revealing this was another sort of landmark, which was stuck in precision and authenticity. On the base of the Memorial is engraved all the fight s that were battled in which Marines gave their lives. Another engraving read Uncommon Valor was a Common Virtue likewise recorded was the names of the six people who the remembrance delineates. Three of the six could never realize that they were deified forever; they passed on before the finish of the war. A forward kicked the bucket soon after the commitment. A straightforward demonstration of pride changed these people into national saints, deified forever in bronze. As in any figure, painting, or show-stopper, line is significant, lines decide the start and the end, and it permits different items to be isolated. The lines in this figure are utilized with such authenticity that it is anything but difficult to see the individual bits of the model however to evacuate any of the pieces would expel the genuine importance of the figure. Felix de Weldon duplicated a valid, past sensible duplicate of the first photograph in this manner permitting the watcher to asses there own emotions or thoughts as what went on the morning of February 19, 1945. There are a large number of drawings, sculptures and duplicates of the first photo and you will locate that huge numbers of them have little however irrelevant contrasts. It isn't the trouble of the procedure of generation that causes the distinctions. The distinctions lie in the generation of the thought on which the photograph speaks to. The commemoration is colossal in size; each figure alone is 33 feet high and is molded in obvious 3 dimensional structure. With its size and its mind blowing point of interest, this renders the commemoration as a genuine helpful occasion. The minor size alone prompts the unselfish significance of this verifiable occasion. The commemoration is found outside on the eastern edge of the Arlington National Cemetery in an open field of around 4 sections of land. To be really propelled by this remembrance it ought to be seen around evening time. The lighting was structured with such precession that minor words can't communicate the extent of the occasion. The commemoration is a solidified second in time, when the world was at war in pretty much every corner. The photo by Joe Rosenthal deified this occasion so all children could see and ideally feel equivalent to he did on that day. The main piece of the landmark that isn't solidified in bronze is the American Flag. The genuine banner adds to the oddity existing apart from everything else. If you somehow managed to evacuate the external skin of the remembrance all you would discover is a useful edge comprised of latters, cranes, brackets and winches, wires and links. The commemoration was a triumph of association as much as a show-stopper. Using projective pictures de Weldon had the option to transform a photograph into a mind blowing masterpiece. The main change that was produced using the first photograph was one of the Marines at the base of the banner was turned internal to include a progressively tasteful appearance. The meeting was with a Marine housewife who has a few individuals from her family that were or are in the military. She saw the dedication as an image of solidarity for our country. To her the dedication is pride in our country and our lifestyle. The commemoration represented a triumphant country. She additionally remarked on the way that the dedication was structured so as to bring out various feelings from every person who sees it. The remembrance represents a wartime country as well as a peacetime country too mind

How to Create the Perfect GTD Workflow with MeisterTask

How to Create the Perfect GTD Workflow with MeisterTask GTD is a productivity technique developed by David Allen and described in his book Getting Things Done: The Art of Stress-Free Productivity. It’s a methodology that encourages people to get all of their to-dos on a central list and process those to-dos weekly in order to stay on top of outstanding tasks and accomplish more. To succeed with GTD, it’s important to use the right tool for collecting and organizing your to-do list, and while we’ll admit we’re a little biased, we think MeisterTask is the perfect tool. In this post, we’ll walk you through how to use MeisterTask for GTD by showing you both a simple approach for GTD beginners and a more advanced approach for GTD masters who want to take advantage of some of MeisterTask’s automations. Simple GTD with MeisterTask GTD is an incredibly scalable system that can be as simple as you want it to be or as complex as you need it to be. But if you’re just getting started with the technique, it’s probably best to keep things relatively simple and get the hang of collecting and processing your to-dos before introducing increasing levels of complexity. With that in mind, here’s how you can take a simple approach to GTD using MeisterTask. Create an effective GTD workflow Try MeisterTask Its free! Try MeisterTask Step 1: Create a GTD project in MeisterTask The first step you need to take is creating a GTD project in MeisterTask. Sign up for a free MeisterTask account or sign in to your account if you already have one. Then, click the plus sign next to “Projects” to create a new GTD project. Give your project a name and, if needed, adjust your sharing settings, then click “Create Project.” Step 2: Set up your capture lane One of the core tenants of GTD is that you have to collect all of your outstanding to-dos in a central system. That means getting all of your to-dos out of your head, your email inbox, your phone, etc. and getting them onto a single list. If you’re using MeisterTask for GTD, you can set up the first lane on your board as your capture list. Click on the text that currently says “Open” and give the lane a new nameâ€"something like “Inbox,” “Capture,” or “To Process.” This is the lane where all of your unprocessed to-dos will live. There are a number of different ways to get your to-dos into this MeisterTask lane. Add new to-dos manually If you’re transcribing your to-dos from a handwritten list or just doing a brain dump of the outstanding tasks in your head, you can add a new to-do manually by clicking the plus icon in your capture lane. Give your task a title, then repeat the process until you’ve added tasks for all of your to-dos. Email to-dos to your MeisterTask lane If you have to-do items in your email inbox, you can forward them to a specific email address to add those tasks to your capture lane. Click the down arrow in the right corner of your lane, then select “Automations.” You’ll see an email address at the bottom that you can forward emails to in order to get them to appear as tasks in your capture lane. Copy that email address and add it to your address book so you can start forwarding any existing and new to-dos to MeisterTask to get everything into your capture lane. Gmail users can also use MeisterTask’s Gmail add-on to add tasks to MeisterTask without forwarding emails or leaving the Gmail interface. The same goes for users of Outlook or Spark. Add to-dos from other tools To add to-dos to your MeisterTask collect lane from other applications, you can use one of our Zapier integrations. This allows you to do things like: Create MeisterTask tasks from Evernote notes. Create MeisterTask tasks from Google Calendar events. Add Google Sheets rows to MeisterTask as tasks. Create tasks in MeisterTask from Slack messages. Zapier lets you connect MeisterTask to more than 1,500 other apps, so you can use its automations to make sure your to-dos in any app are added to your collect lane. And if you’re an IFTTT user instead, you can also use our IFTTT integration to build custom workflows for adding your to-dos to your capture lane. Migrate tasks from Trello or Asana If you’ve been using Trello or Asana and want to switch to MeisterTask, you can import your Trello boards or Asana projects with just a few clicks to save yourself the time of manually copying and pasting all of your to-dos between the two tools. Step 3: Create your processing lanes Once you have all of your outstanding tasks in your capture lane, it’s time to make some decisions about how you’ll organize and process your to-dos. GTD recommends a variety of lists you may want to consider adding, but for a simple approach, we recommend the following: Next Actions: Tasks you need to complete Projects: To-dos that represent larger bodies of work and multiple tasks Tickler: Things you need to do in the future but cannot begin on yet Someday: Things you’d like to do one of these days but aren’t priorities Done: Tasks you’ve completed You can edit any existing lanes on your GTD board to give them the appropriate titles by clicking on the text of the current lane name, and you can add new lanes by clicking “+ Add Section.” You can also change the background color of any lane header by clicking the down arrow in the right corner of the header and selecting a different background color. Finally, once you’ve created all of your lanes, you can simply click on the icon in any lane’s header and drag and drop it to the appropriate spot to order your lanes as desired. Step 4: Start processing your to-dos Once you have all of your lanes set up, you’re ready to start processing your to-dos as part of your weekly review. Go through each item in your capture lane and drag them to the appropriate lanes: If a task will take you less than two minutes to complete, just go ahead and do it, then drag it into your “Done” lane. If a task will take you more than two minutes to complete, drag it into whichever lane is appropriate: Next Actions, Tickler, or Someday. If a task is very large and needs to be broken down into multiple subtasks, drag it into the “Projects” lane. When you’re finished, your capture lane should be empty. All of your tasks should be in the other lanes on your board. During your weekly review, you can also start breaking down your projects using MeisterTask’s checklist feature. Click on a project task to open it, then select “Add Checklist Item.” Enter the tasks you’ll need to complete as part of that project. When you’re ready, you can turn these checklist items into their own tasks. For time-sensitive items in your “Next Actions” and “Tickler” lanes, you can add due dates to your tasks to make sure nothing gets overlooked. Just click on a task to open it, click “Due Date,” and select a due date. You can also filter your board to only show items that are due today, tomorrow, within a week, within two weeks, within a month, or in the past. To filter your board, toggle the switch in the right navigation menu to open it, click the filter icon, click the dropdown next to “Due date” and select the desired timeframe. If you select “Due today,” for example, your board will update to only show tasks with due dates set for today. Finally, you can also prioritize any of the items in your list by dragging and dropping your task cards into the order you plan to/need to complete them. Step 5: Start getting things done Now that you have your project set up, your lanes created, and your tasks consolidated and organized, you can start getting things done. Just work from your “Next Actions” lane, review the tasks in that lane daily, capture your to-dos as they come in, and process your capture lane once a week. Advanced GTD with MeisterTask If you’ve gotten the hang of the basic GTD process and are ready to take things a step further, MeisterTask can help with that, too. For example, in David Allen’s “Engage” step of the GTD workflow, he recommends further organizing your tasks by context (i.e. work vs. home), time available (how long will it take), energy available (how much energy do you need to complete the task), and priority (how important is it to complete the task). Assigning categories to tasks not only helps you keep your tasks organizedâ€"i.e. you can have separate lists for work to-dos and personal to-dosâ€"but it also helps you make better decisions when you need to choose what to work on next. For example, you can choose tasks you categorized as low-energy when you’re feeling tired or tasks you decided would only take a few minutes when you’re strapped for time. And since you made these decisions while you were processing your tasks, you don’t have to think through all of those details in the decision-making moment. If you want to engage in more advanced GTD with MeisterTask, you’ll need to create another project. Here’s how to do it. Step 1: Create a new capture and categorize project This new project will serve as both the place you capture your to-dos and the place where you add context to those to-dos. Start by creating a new project in MeisterTask. Name your project something like “GTD Inbox.” Once your project is created, add the lanes you need to add context to your tasks. For example: You may want a lane for “Home” and a lane for “Work” to categorize the things you need to do by where you need to do them. You may want lanes for timeframes like “30 Minutes,” One Hour,” “Two Hours,” “Four hours,” and “One Day” to categorize tasks by how long you think they’ll take to complete. You may want lanes for “High Energy,” “Medium Energy,” and “Low Energy” to categorize tasks by how much energy they’ll take to complete. You may want lanes for “High Priority,” “Medium Priority,” and “Low Priority” to categorize tasks by their importance. Add lanes for any of the categories you want to use to the left of your capture lane in MeisterTask. Step 2: Create tags for each of your categories Now, we want to create tags for each of our categories. This will let us see each task’s categories at a glance. Open any one of your tasks by clicking on it, click “Tags,” and select “Manage.” Click “Add Tag,” then type the name of your first category. Repeat this process until you have one tag for each of your categories. You can also change the color of your tags if you want by clicking any tag and selecting a color. Step 3: Create automations to automatically apply tags to tasks Next, we want to set up automations that tag cards with their categories as we put them into the right lanes. Start with your first category lane. Click the down arrow in the lane’s header and select “Automations” “Add Automation.” On the automation selection screen, select “Update Tags.” On the “Add Automation” screen, select the “Add these Tags” radio button, select the appropriate tag for the category, check the box next to “Run this action on all existing tasks in this section,” and click “Done.” Repeat these steps for each of your categories. When you’re finished, dropping any card into a category lane will automatically add that category’s tag to that task. This lets you move cards into each category group (context, time available, energy available, and priority) to add the tags you’ll need later to make decisions about which tasks to pick up. Step 4: Create an automation to move your cards to your main GTD board Since this board is just for capturing tasks and categorizing them, we need a way to get our captured and categorized tasks onto our main GTD board. We can do that automatically by creating a final “Move” lane on our GTD Capture board and creating another automation. Once you’ve created your “Move” lane, click the down arrow in the lane’s header and select “Automations” “Add Automation.” Select “Move Task.” Click the dropdown under “Move to” and select your main GTD project. Select your capture list’s name under “Sections.” Finally, check the box next to “Run this action on all existing tasks in this section,” then click “Done.” Now, when you’re finished categorizing your tasks, you can drop your tasks into the “Move” lane to automatically send them to your main GTD project’s capture lane. Step 5: Start categorizing your tasks When you do your weekly review, start with your capture and categorize board. Drag each task into the appropriate lane to add its tag. When you’re finished, drag the task into the “Move” lane to automatically send it to your main GTD board. After that, you can use your main GTD board to make decisions about how to organize and complete your tasks. And you can even filter your board to show only tasks tagged with certain categories (e.g. only work tasks or only tasks that will take less than 30 minutes to complete) to make decisions more quickly. Other Ways MeisterTask Helps With GTD In addition to the workflow recommendations we’ve shared, there are a lot of other features in MeisterTask that you can use to GTD better: Need to delegate some of your tasks? You can add employees, coworkers, or even a spouse to your MeisterTask project to delegate tasks easily. Need to track the time you spend on tasks? Enable time tracking for your project to keep your tasks and your time records in the same tool. Need to see your task list while on the go? Download our Android or iOS apps to quickly access your tasks from anywhere in the world, even when you’re not connected to the internet. If you use MeisterTask with GTD and have a tip we didn’t cover in this post, we’d love to hear more about it in the comments below! Create an effective GTD workflow Try MeisterTask Its free! Try MeisterTask How to Create the Perfect GTD Workflow with MeisterTask GTD is a productivity technique developed by David Allen and described in his book Getting Things Done: The Art of Stress-Free Productivity. It’s a methodology that encourages people to get all of their to-dos on a central list and process those to-dos weekly in order to stay on top of outstanding tasks and accomplish more. To succeed with GTD, it’s important to use the right tool for collecting and organizing your to-do list, and while we’ll admit we’re a little biased, we think MeisterTask is the perfect tool. In this post, we’ll walk you through how to use MeisterTask for GTD by showing you both a simple approach for GTD beginners and a more advanced approach for GTD masters who want to take advantage of some of MeisterTask’s automations. Simple GTD with MeisterTask GTD is an incredibly scalable system that can be as simple as you want it to be or as complex as you need it to be. But if you’re just getting started with the technique, it’s probably best to keep things relatively simple and get the hang of collecting and processing your to-dos before introducing increasing levels of complexity. With that in mind, here’s how you can take a simple approach to GTD using MeisterTask. Create an effective GTD workflow Try MeisterTask Its free! Try MeisterTask Step 1: Create a GTD project in MeisterTask The first step you need to take is creating a GTD project in MeisterTask. Sign up for a free MeisterTask account or sign in to your account if you already have one. Then, click the plus sign next to “Projects” to create a new GTD project. Give your project a name and, if needed, adjust your sharing settings, then click “Create Project.” Step 2: Set up your capture lane One of the core tenants of GTD is that you have to collect all of your outstanding to-dos in a central system. That means getting all of your to-dos out of your head, your email inbox, your phone, etc. and getting them onto a single list. If you’re using MeisterTask for GTD, you can set up the first lane on your board as your capture list. Click on the text that currently says “Open” and give the lane a new nameâ€"something like “Inbox,” “Capture,” or “To Process.” This is the lane where all of your unprocessed to-dos will live. There are a number of different ways to get your to-dos into this MeisterTask lane. Add new to-dos manually If you’re transcribing your to-dos from a handwritten list or just doing a brain dump of the outstanding tasks in your head, you can add a new to-do manually by clicking the plus icon in your capture lane. Give your task a title, then repeat the process until you’ve added tasks for all of your to-dos. Email to-dos to your MeisterTask lane If you have to-do items in your email inbox, you can forward them to a specific email address to add those tasks to your capture lane. Click the down arrow in the right corner of your lane, then select “Automations.” You’ll see an email address at the bottom that you can forward emails to in order to get them to appear as tasks in your capture lane. Copy that email address and add it to your address book so you can start forwarding any existing and new to-dos to MeisterTask to get everything into your capture lane. Gmail users can also use MeisterTask’s Gmail add-on to add tasks to MeisterTask without forwarding emails or leaving the Gmail interface. The same goes for users of Outlook or Spark. Add to-dos from other tools To add to-dos to your MeisterTask collect lane from other applications, you can use one of our Zapier integrations. This allows you to do things like: Create MeisterTask tasks from Evernote notes. Create MeisterTask tasks from Google Calendar events. Add Google Sheets rows to MeisterTask as tasks. Create tasks in MeisterTask from Slack messages. Zapier lets you connect MeisterTask to more than 1,500 other apps, so you can use its automations to make sure your to-dos in any app are added to your collect lane. And if you’re an IFTTT user instead, you can also use our IFTTT integration to build custom workflows for adding your to-dos to your capture lane. Migrate tasks from Trello or Asana If you’ve been using Trello or Asana and want to switch to MeisterTask, you can import your Trello boards or Asana projects with just a few clicks to save yourself the time of manually copying and pasting all of your to-dos between the two tools. Step 3: Create your processing lanes Once you have all of your outstanding tasks in your capture lane, it’s time to make some decisions about how you’ll organize and process your to-dos. GTD recommends a variety of lists you may want to consider adding, but for a simple approach, we recommend the following: Next Actions: Tasks you need to complete Projects: To-dos that represent larger bodies of work and multiple tasks Tickler: Things you need to do in the future but cannot begin on yet Someday: Things you’d like to do one of these days but aren’t priorities Done: Tasks you’ve completed You can edit any existing lanes on your GTD board to give them the appropriate titles by clicking on the text of the current lane name, and you can add new lanes by clicking “+ Add Section.” You can also change the background color of any lane header by clicking the down arrow in the right corner of the header and selecting a different background color. Finally, once you’ve created all of your lanes, you can simply click on the icon in any lane’s header and drag and drop it to the appropriate spot to order your lanes as desired. Step 4: Start processing your to-dos Once you have all of your lanes set up, you’re ready to start processing your to-dos as part of your weekly review. Go through each item in your capture lane and drag them to the appropriate lanes: If a task will take you less than two minutes to complete, just go ahead and do it, then drag it into your “Done” lane. If a task will take you more than two minutes to complete, drag it into whichever lane is appropriate: Next Actions, Tickler, or Someday. If a task is very large and needs to be broken down into multiple subtasks, drag it into the “Projects” lane. When you’re finished, your capture lane should be empty. All of your tasks should be in the other lanes on your board. During your weekly review, you can also start breaking down your projects using MeisterTask’s checklist feature. Click on a project task to open it, then select “Add Checklist Item.” Enter the tasks you’ll need to complete as part of that project. When you’re ready, you can turn these checklist items into their own tasks. For time-sensitive items in your “Next Actions” and “Tickler” lanes, you can add due dates to your tasks to make sure nothing gets overlooked. Just click on a task to open it, click “Due Date,” and select a due date. You can also filter your board to only show items that are due today, tomorrow, within a week, within two weeks, within a month, or in the past. To filter your board, toggle the switch in the right navigation menu to open it, click the filter icon, click the dropdown next to “Due date” and select the desired timeframe. If you select “Due today,” for example, your board will update to only show tasks with due dates set for today. Finally, you can also prioritize any of the items in your list by dragging and dropping your task cards into the order you plan to/need to complete them. Step 5: Start getting things done Now that you have your project set up, your lanes created, and your tasks consolidated and organized, you can start getting things done. Just work from your “Next Actions” lane, review the tasks in that lane daily, capture your to-dos as they come in, and process your capture lane once a week. Advanced GTD with MeisterTask If you’ve gotten the hang of the basic GTD process and are ready to take things a step further, MeisterTask can help with that, too. For example, in David Allen’s “Engage” step of the GTD workflow, he recommends further organizing your tasks by context (i.e. work vs. home), time available (how long will it take), energy available (how much energy do you need to complete the task), and priority (how important is it to complete the task). Assigning categories to tasks not only helps you keep your tasks organizedâ€"i.e. you can have separate lists for work to-dos and personal to-dosâ€"but it also helps you make better decisions when you need to choose what to work on next. For example, you can choose tasks you categorized as low-energy when you’re feeling tired or tasks you decided would only take a few minutes when you’re strapped for time. And since you made these decisions while you were processing your tasks, you don’t have to think through all of those details in the decision-making moment. If you want to engage in more advanced GTD with MeisterTask, you’ll need to create another project. Here’s how to do it. Step 1: Create a new capture and categorize project This new project will serve as both the place you capture your to-dos and the place where you add context to those to-dos. Start by creating a new project in MeisterTask. Name your project something like “GTD Inbox.” Once your project is created, add the lanes you need to add context to your tasks. For example: You may want a lane for “Home” and a lane for “Work” to categorize the things you need to do by where you need to do them. You may want lanes for timeframes like “30 Minutes,” One Hour,” “Two Hours,” “Four hours,” and “One Day” to categorize tasks by how long you think they’ll take to complete. You may want lanes for “High Energy,” “Medium Energy,” and “Low Energy” to categorize tasks by how much energy they’ll take to complete. You may want lanes for “High Priority,” “Medium Priority,” and “Low Priority” to categorize tasks by their importance. Add lanes for any of the categories you want to use to the left of your capture lane in MeisterTask. Step 2: Create tags for each of your categories Now, we want to create tags for each of our categories. This will let us see each task’s categories at a glance. Open any one of your tasks by clicking on it, click “Tags,” and select “Manage.” Click “Add Tag,” then type the name of your first category. Repeat this process until you have one tag for each of your categories. You can also change the color of your tags if you want by clicking any tag and selecting a color. Step 3: Create automations to automatically apply tags to tasks Next, we want to set up automations that tag cards with their categories as we put them into the right lanes. Start with your first category lane. Click the down arrow in the lane’s header and select “Automations” “Add Automation.” On the automation selection screen, select “Update Tags.” On the “Add Automation” screen, select the “Add these Tags” radio button, select the appropriate tag for the category, check the box next to “Run this action on all existing tasks in this section,” and click “Done.” Repeat these steps for each of your categories. When you’re finished, dropping any card into a category lane will automatically add that category’s tag to that task. This lets you move cards into each category group (context, time available, energy available, and priority) to add the tags you’ll need later to make decisions about which tasks to pick up. Step 4: Create an automation to move your cards to your main GTD board Since this board is just for capturing tasks and categorizing them, we need a way to get our captured and categorized tasks onto our main GTD board. We can do that automatically by creating a final “Move” lane on our GTD Capture board and creating another automation. Once you’ve created your “Move” lane, click the down arrow in the lane’s header and select “Automations” “Add Automation.” Select “Move Task.” Click the dropdown under “Move to” and select your main GTD project. Select your capture list’s name under “Sections.” Finally, check the box next to “Run this action on all existing tasks in this section,” then click “Done.” Now, when you’re finished categorizing your tasks, you can drop your tasks into the “Move” lane to automatically send them to your main GTD project’s capture lane. Step 5: Start categorizing your tasks When you do your weekly review, start with your capture and categorize board. Drag each task into the appropriate lane to add its tag. When you’re finished, drag the task into the “Move” lane to automatically send it to your main GTD board. After that, you can use your main GTD board to make decisions about how to organize and complete your tasks. And you can even filter your board to show only tasks tagged with certain categories (e.g. only work tasks or only tasks that will take less than 30 minutes to complete) to make decisions more quickly. Other Ways MeisterTask Helps With GTD In addition to the workflow recommendations we’ve shared, there are a lot of other features in MeisterTask that you can use to GTD better: Need to delegate some of your tasks? You can add employees, coworkers, or even a spouse to your MeisterTask project to delegate tasks easily. Need to track the time you spend on tasks? Enable time tracking for your project to keep your tasks and your time records in the same tool. Need to see your task list while on the go? Download our Android or iOS apps to quickly access your tasks from anywhere in the world, even when you’re not connected to the internet. If you use MeisterTask with GTD and have a tip we didn’t cover in this post, we’d love to hear more about it in the comments below! Create an effective GTD workflow Try MeisterTask Its free! Try MeisterTask

Friendly Letters - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 3 Words: 905 Downloads: 10 Date added: 2017/09/11 Category Advertising Essay Did you like this example? Friendly letters have five parts:  Ã‚  Ã‚ ¦ The Heading:   The heading can include your address and the date. In casual, friendly letters your address is not necessary. The Salutation (greeting): This usually begins with Dear_________. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Friendly Letters" essay for you Create order The blank is for the name of the person you are writing. After you write the persons name you put a comma ( , ) . The Body: The body of the letter is the information you are writing in your letter. The Closing:   In the closing the first word is capitalized and you put a comma after the last word. The c lassic friendly letter has five parts as follows: 1. Address Block Includes your return address and the date of writing the letter. This block is usually right-justified. 2. Opening Salutation This is the opening greeting; typically Dear John. These days, in a letter to a close friend such informal greetings as Hey John, are also acceptable. Left-justify this block. 3. Body Block This is your actual letter content. It can be anywhere from a few paragraphs in length up to multiple pages. There is no hard or fast rule for the length of a friendly letter. Make it as long as you like, or as long as you think your friend would find acceptable to read. The body paragraphs should be left justified. 4. Closing Salutation This is where you say goodbye. Typically, closing salutations for friendly letters include such phrases as: Yours truly,, Your friend,, All the best,, Take care,. These days, more informal closing salutations are also acceptable, such as: See you soon,, Dont be a stranger,, etc. Left-justify the closing salutation. 5. Signature Block Since it is a friendly letter to someone who knows you reasonably well, just sign your first name. Also left-justify this block. Traditionally, a friendly letter would he hand-written and then sent by regular snail mail. This is something I still recommend when possible, because it really gives it a personal touch. However, in these days of software word processors, friendly letters are often created in typed form and appended to an e-mail as an as an attachment. This is acceptable, considering it is still more personal than a typical impersonal e-mail. IMPORTANCE Nevertheless, for those who still like to communicate the old-fashioned way, a sincere friendly letter is a nice personal touch. For the receiver, its definitely a lot more pleasant to receive a traditional friendly letter than it will ever be to receive an e-mail or an instant message. For the sender, it makes them appear as if they really care since they have gone to the trouble of writing an actual letter. It is a method of communication that can be used by one to send the messages to ones dear ones. There is a complete procedure that has to be followed after the letter is posted in order to reach the destination. The importance of letters is now reducing because of the emails as this is more efficient and quick method of communication then the letters. But there are certain situations when the use of letters is preferred to the emails and the method of the letter is chosen mostly by the companies for official purposes. To write a letter is easier than the emails because there is no need of any specific device while writing a letter and everyone can use this facility very easily. Same is the case with the receiver because no specific device is required to access the letter as everyone has a home. Another biggest advantage of the letters is that the recipient of the letter can maintain the physical record of all of his mails. One does need to take pain of switching on the computer in order to read the mails or the letters of the beloved ones. We can express our feelings in a manner. We can write everything what had happen ,but we cannot write in emails ,fax,messages. The advantages of the letter is that it provides a written communication, it can range from one to many pages, it does not use any output devices so it much cheaper, the written letter can be recorded, letters are good when people do know how to use internet facility and also it helps long distance relationships. Letters can be good for this hotel because it keeps the record of what they have sent to the customers and it will give them a good relationship with the customers. A letter can be sent out to arrange some meetings, give ideas or to confirm an agreement. not every one has he time to switch on the computer and then write message so Purpose of Writing a Friendly Letter The purpose of writing a friendly letter is simple, to keep in touch with other people, like friends and relatives. Before the invention of modern communication modes and methods, people depended mainly on letters to keep in touch. Old people always comment that there is a certain feeling of satisfaction that they experience on receiving a hand written letter of a near relative or friend. I experienced a similar feeling, when my father, who was in Spain at that time, wrote me a letter describing the features of a very old chapel. Even though we have the most up-to-date technology to facilitate communication, I always feel that we should indeed be connected to our near and dear ones, by the way of emotions poured out in ink on that simple piece of paper.

The On The Streams Model Essay - 916 Words

The streams model was developed John Kingdon in 2003. It is a powerful tool in understanding policy process. It consists of three parallel processes: problem streams, policy streams, and politic streams (Knaggard, 2015). These three parallel process can also go under multiple different names. Problem streams refers to policy problem that requires attention; issues that capture everyone’s attention (Howlett, Ramesh and Perl, 2009). Policy streams, also known as solution streams, pertains to many potential policy solutions that originate from communities of policy experts, also known as, ‘policy primeval soup’ in which policy ideas and solutions are formed, rejected, and selected (Howlett et al.). Lastly, political streams refer to social and political factors such as public opinion, election results, and demands of interest groups (Howlett et al.). Kingdon states that when the three streams joined at a critical moment, it would constitute a policy window (Chow, 20 14). When this window opens, the issue becomes part of the policy agenda and policymaking steps will follow (Chow). The convergence of streams is determined by the presence of policy windows and the actions of policy entrepreneurs (Chow). Policy entrepreneurs, actors who introduce and promote ideas, will the spend time to increase their chances of getting an idea placed on the decision-making agenda (Chow). Strengths of Streams Model Streams model is an enhanced version of the Garbage Can model developed in 1971Show MoreRelatedUsing Kingdon s Policy Streams Model1199 Words   |  5 Pagesone must have in wording the issue. The purpose of this paper is to discuss a problem that has been identified. Background on the problem will be provided, the significance will be examined, and a discussion of the problem using Kingdon’s Policy Streams Model will be delivered. Identification of Problem Immunization via vaccines has been a hot topic of debate in recent years. As with many issues advocates for and against vaccines can be found. The problem that has been identified is that Nevada isRead MoreClassification And Novel Class Detection Approaches Of Feature Evolving Data Stream1716 Words   |  7 PagesEvolving Data Stream Abstract: The classification of data stream is challenging task for data mining community. Dynamic changing nature of data stream has some difficulties such as feature evolution, concept evolution, concept drift and infinite length. As we know that the data streams are huge in amount, it is impractical to store and use all the data for training. Concept drift occurs when underlying concept changes. Concept-evolution occurs as a result of new classes evolving in the stream. AnotherRead MoreStormwater Management Staff On The Four Mile Run Watershed Model793 Words   |  4 PagesFour Mile Run Watershed Model Oct 26, 2017 Meeting Notes In Attendance: Sayedul Choudhury, Riyam Alobaidi, Elizabeth Thurber and Guosheng Qui Sayedul provided an update on the Four Mile Run SWMM5 Model. A model summary and a map of model components (see attached) were handed out. The Four Mile Run SWMM5 Model results were found to match observed flows at the Shirlington gage, especially for large storms (5,000 cfs or larger). However, for the tributaries, small streams and upper Four Mile Run segmentsRead MoreThe Responsibility Of The Right Holders1383 Words   |  6 Pagesincrease the power of those who are vulnerable. Kingdon’s Policy Streams Model John Kingdon’s policy streams model is a theoretical framework that can be used to examine the issue of First Nations communities’ water crisis and how there is a need for the issue to be addressed by the government. Essentially, John Kingdon’s model includes three streams known as the problem stream, the policy stream and the political stream. The streams model can be access the agenda setting and the solution that was providedRead MoreScope Of Work For The Four Mile Run Watershed Management Program1308 Words   |  6 Pagesthe natural process of infiltration and causes a greatly increased surface water runoff. Also, urbanization has replaced most of the watershed s natural stream channels with an elaborate network of storm sewers. These sewers carry the increased volume of surface runoff quicker than it would in natural channels causing flashier and larger stream flows downstream. Runoff from the Four Mile Run watershed quickly makes its way into the Potomac River, and eventually drains into the Chesapeake Bay. WatershedRead MoreThe Approach At High Level1025 Words   |  5 Pageshelps to get a head start. The approach at high-level consists of four major steps: Value stream mapping – Mapping the existing process workflows Future state value stream mapping – Identify the immediate goals and visualize the optimized value stream map Execution – Incremental approach towards the implementation Retrospection – Review and learn Ok, let’s get started! Value Stream Mapping Value stream mapping is a lean improvement strategy that maps the processes and information flows of a productRead MoreReflux Ratio, Higher Is The Purity Of The Distillate And Bottom Stream1561 Words   |  7 Pagesof the distillate and bottom stream [4], [19]. Depending on the bubble point of the vapor at the top of the column and the economics of the process, the distillation column may be equipped with a total condenser or a partial condenser [20]–[22]. A total condenser condenses the entire vapor at the top of the column into liquid which is then split into distillate stream and reflux stream. If a column has a total condenser then there would be no ‘vapor distillate’ stream in Figure 1.2. A partial condenserRead MoreData Stream Mining Addresses Research Issues Addressed by the Data Mining Community912 Words   |  4 PagesData stream mining is a stimulating field of study that has raised challenges and research issues to be addressed by the database and dat a mining communities. The following is a discussion of both addressed and open research issues [19]. Handling the continuous flow of data streams This is a data management issue. Traditional database management systems are not capable of dealing with such continuous high data rate. Novel indexing, storage and querying techniques are required to handle this nonRead MoreThe Effects Of Ddt On The Environment1252 Words   |  6 Pagesbetween 2003-2014. WSDA staff collected weekly water samples in four to six salmon-bearing streams that were located near agriculture land all across Washington State. Basins that were sampled included the Nooksack and Lower Skagit basins (Northwest region of the state), the lower Yakima basin (Eastside region) and the Wenatchee basin (Central Washington region). The WSDA staff also sampled two salmon-bearing streams on the west side of the cascades that were located in urban environments. Washington StateRead MoreWe Propose A Novel Framework For Tweet Segmentation1030 Words   |  5 Pageslocal context). For the latter, we propose and evaluate two models to derive local context by considering the l inguistic features and term-dependency in a batch of tweets, respectively. HybridSeg is also designed to iteratively learn from confident segments as pseudo feedback. As an application, we show that high accuracy is achieved in named entity recognition by applying segment-based part-of-speech (POS) tagging. Index Terms-Twitter stream, Tweet segmentation, Named Entity Recognition, Linguistic

Accountability Issue of Petronas Free Essays

Accountability issue of PETRONAS-Transparency 1. According to the article written by Datuk Dr Jeffrey Kitingan, a politician from Sabah who was a Vice President of Parti Keadilan Rakyat when he wrote this article. He said that Petronas agreements have been classified as secret. We will write a custom essay sample on Accountability Issue of Petronas or any similar topic only for you Order Now The clauses in the agreement are shielded from public scrutiny, this leads to transparency issue arise and making it an organization without public accountability. For example, 80% of the oil produced by Petronas is not sold directly to the world market but is channeled through six ‘option holders’ who obtain the supply from Petronas at below market prices. Only 20% of the oil produced by Petronas is sold through direct open bidding. Because of this arrangement, Petronas is not maximizing its revenue by dealing direct with the open world market. Instead, it has been incurring incalculable losses for the nation and for the people. How much this huge loss is, we will never know. It is understood that this supply through the option holders is sold by contracts with a binding agreement for 20 or 30 years, causing huge losses for Petronas when oil price increases, as Petronas would then have to continue selling at the old agreed price. Because of the agreement (contract) is not disclose to the public, thus, the public do not know who these option holders are and why they are in the first place. Besides, the public also wondering that are these people representing certain private interests? Because of the non transparent of Petronas agreements, many questions have been raised and the public think Petronas is a huge organization which is not accountable and secretive. 2. The annual report of Petronas is not in detail. For example, we can make a comparison between the 2011 annual report of Shell and 2011 annual report of Petronas. As we can see from the picture below, the related party disclosure of Shell is more detail than Petronas. Shell discloses the company name that where the sale to and where the purchase from, however, Petronas just disclose the sale and purchases in general. This also means that Petronas annual report lack of transparency. In addition, Shell annual report also provides a detailed information of company properties, whereas, Petronas did not provide this information in annual report. | | How to cite Accountability Issue of Petronas, Essay examples

John Calvin and Martin Luther free essay sample

Martin Luther and John Calvin were two religious reformers who were similar in that they both believed that religious authority rested in the Bible. But, they had different views of sacraments and religious doctrines. During the 16th and 17th centuries, Lutheranism and Calvinism began to gain a lot of attention. Both these men were leading influences of the Protestant Reformation, which was a time period when people began to question the church and how government and society should be adhered. The Reformation emerged in the 16th century as a series of attempts to reform the Roman Catholic Church in Western Europe. As religious reformers, Calvin and Luther wanted to stop the abuses of the Catholic Church and return to a more spiritual Christianity. Although they followed two different religions, Lutheranism and Calvinism, they still had similar attitudes about political authority and social order. They both denied the political power of the pope. We will write a custom essay sample on John Calvin and Martin Luther or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page They denounced the Pope and said that he was not infallible. They also believed in following the words of the scriptures because they believed that the scriptures were the original basis of Christianity. They also believed in regional ecclesiastical autonomy. They didn’t want the pope to rule each region but they did want each region to have independence over what religion they wanted to practice. Although they agreed about some things, they also disagreed about many other things. Luther believed in political and religious autonomy of the state. He also did not want to alter the political structure of the government. He wanted the monarchy to remain as the form of government. This was because Luther was accused of heresy by Emperor Charles V and would have been put to death but Prince Fredrick III helped him out, saving his life. Therefore he wanted to keep the monarchy as the political authority over the state. But he also encouraged German princes to reform the Church in their states and advertised the idea that the Church was not subject to the pope’s interpretation. However, John Calvin believed that church and state should be one and that political authority should be changed from monarchy to the reformed church. Calvin and Luther also had their own set of social orders which they believed in. Luther believed that all people were equal in God’s eyes. He also believed in salvation. He held that salvation comes by faith  alone. He emphasized that all people were saved only by the decision of God. Luther also rejected the idea that the Church and priests held special powers. Martin Luther believed in consubstantiation which is the belief that the body and blood of Christ are present and exist along with the elements of bread and wine. However, John Calvin believed that the body and blood of Christ are spiritually present in the bread and wine but not physically present. Calvin also believed in the doctrine of predestination, which is the belief that all events have been decided by God. He enforced this concept because he believed that specific people were chosen as God’s â€Å"elect†, or the ones favored by God for salvation.